Friday, January 16, 2026

We Can't Coffin Dodge Forever; Obituary Writing

                                            L.E. Caldwell 

 …The Inane Ramblings of a Geezerly Septuagenarian


    All men have an emotion to kill; when they strongly dislike some one they involuntarily wish he was dead. I have never killed any one,” wrote Clarence Darrow, “but I have read some obituary notices with great satisfaction.”

Without doubt, most everyone is familiar with the word obituary. With every passing day, we are closer to taking that eternal dirt nap; we can only coffin dodge for so long. But just in case there is any uncertainty, an obituary is a notice of someone’s death, typically published in a newspaper  or online. It usually includes a brief biography of the deceased person’s life, his or her past and present family, and what funeral arrangements have been made.

As a youngster, our local weekly newspaper (my father was one of the editors) printed death notices on the front page…not buried in the back like last week’s news (no pun intended). It was important. 

And depending on the size of the newspaper and the staff, some larger paper had an ‘obit desk’ and a specific staff writer who took the information and wrote the obituary notices according to the guideline of that newspaper. I have written my fair share of obituaries over the years…in fact I wrote my father’s obituary when he died in 1983 at age 62.

I recently received an email from an old editor friend, feigning his death in obituary form…he wasn’t really dead, just making a point. He had a message to perpetuate…an agenda to push.

His writing is on point, though religiously slanted in this instance. I worked with him before his religious transformation from heathenism (his words) to which he credits his second wife. He was a great writer then. And I’m not here to throw stones or cast judgement, but for me religion, simply-put, is a faith-based belief system. And it’s called faith-based because of the lack of supporting evidence. But I digress. That’s a topic for another day.

My friend did bring up some interesting points, saying “I recognize that there are many Christian denominations and not all have the same beliefs, but I think most believe in eternal life.

“I wrote my obituary myself,” he continued, “because I wanted to depart a Christian message to readers who might not understand any of this. Also, I suppose it could be said, I wanted to have the last word.

“But the actual fact of the matter is that God has the last word. Hope to see some of you in the  hereafter.”

Okay, for me the take away here, has nothing to do with religion and God having the last word, it’s more about the writer having the last say…the final word. I have already written my obituary, except for the ending which of course remains to be played out on the stage of life. I prefer to speak for myself, tell my own story and perhaps impart a few words of wisdom…an obituary with editorial license if you will. Writing in objective third person may take some practice...there is a learning curve.

Who better to write about what we represent and who we are than ourselves.  It’s concerning when someone else claims to know more about us, than we know about ourselves and feel the need to speak on our behalf when it comes to matters of life and especially our final words. An obituary is our last best attempt to set the record straight…it’s a personal accounting of sorts.

Growing up in a newspaper family…reading, writing and english are second nature. You could get a less than stellar grade in Math, but it was ‘Katy bar the door’ if you didn’t excel in English. When I enrolled in college and signed up for Introduction to Reporting, the first assignment was to write about ourselves as if we were telling our own story in obituary form…it was interesting to see the faces of my classmates; the paper was due by the end of class. There were no personal computers at that time…just pen to paper. It proved to be a daunting task for some.

I read obituaries everyday…you know the punchline…if my name is not listed, then I’ll go ahead and have that second cup of coffee; in my case with an extra jigger of Bailey’s Irish Creme. 

It’s important to be truthful when telling your own story. I have read many an obituary that was so saccharin-filled that the page was sticky to the touch…it may well be an honest accounting, but not necessarily true…there is a difference. It is even more troubling when you know with certainly that some of the information is simply not factual. Just for clarification, truth is objective fact, while honesty is more about one’s beliefs…making honesty about intent and truth about accuracy. No need to muddy the waters, it is often best to just leave some stones unturned.

It reminds me of the famous Samuel Clemons (Mark Twain) quote. Setting the stage: It was May of 1897 and Clemens was in London on a speaking tour that had begun nearly two years prior. He had hoped to use the fees from the speaking engagements to pay off the considerable debts he owed in the United States.

While he was in London, someone started a rumor that the author was gravely ill. It was further reported by at least one newspaper that he had died. When Clemens got wind of the stories and his impending death, he humorously told a newspaper writer…“The report of my death was an exaggeration.”

As we get older, it is important to ponder life, and write down what you know to be true and accurate…don’t leave it others. Death has a way of masking our true selves from the reality of who we truly are, at least according to those that claim to know us best. Death pushes those most dear to exaggerate the good and eulogize the deceased as someone above reproach. 

        Just for the record: I am not the life of the party, overly kind or generous to a fault. My smile does not light up a room, nor have I never met a stranger...enough said.





Friday, January 9, 2026

  Flogging A Dead Horse

                               L.E. Caldwell 

 …The Inane Ramblings of a Geezerly Septuagenarian



Have you ever been accused of ‘flogging a dead horse’ or as we say in American English ‘beating a dead horse'?

A while back, I wrote to an old editor friend of mine (just a little older than me) complaining that I had become tired of reading the redundancy in columns written by the same editor on the same topic…it is like flogging a dead horse I said.

He was quick to remind me ‘that all of us who write regularly, will from time to time, beat a dead horse, and even borrow someone else’s dead horse to beat anew’…he’s right of course.

Just to be clear…flogging is a type of beating, defined by the use of specific tools (like whips, rods and canes). Beating is a general act which may include the hand, fist or about any implement of your choosing. The horse remains dead just the same. You say ‘tuh-MAY-toh’…I say ‘tuh-MAH-toh’. 

So, where am I going with this? 

First, perhaps a little history is in order. The expression ‘flogging a dead horse’ is reported to have been spoken by English politician and orator John Bight in the House of Commons.  According to newspaper accounts, while debating parliamentary reform in March of 1859, Francis Wemyss Charteris, 9 Earl of Wemyss, also known as Lord Elcho remarked that Bright had described his own efforts to revive interest in the issue as ‘flogging a dead horse.’

For context: Horses, at the time were a primary source of labor and ‘flogging’ or ‘beating’ was a standard practice to make the horse move; doing so to a dead horse was considered the ultimate metaphor for futility. 

  Flogging a dead horse is nothing new and continues with little chance of slowing any time soon…much to my chagrin. 

Many of our elected officials engage in flogging…generally along party lines. When in doubt…create a conspiracy theory, promote it, blame others, and then beat the lie to death, all the while sweeping the truth neatly under the rug.…There is not enough 20 mule team borax to adequately wash out the offending mouths. What happened to all the talk of truth and transparency?

In the United States it would be safe to say that the majority of us that are old enough to vote remember the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol, when Trump supporters, smashed windows and doors and assaulted law enforcement officers; believing the lies of a rigged election. 

Over this past year, in his second term, President Donald Trump continues to beat the stolen election dead horse and is actively engaged in a campaign to rewrite history.

On Tuesday, according to the New York Times, the five-year anniversary of the Jan. 6 attack, Trump was again spewing doubt about the integrity of American elections. “Our elections are crooked as hell,” Trump told congressional Republicans.

Also Tuesday, the Trump administration created a new page on the White House website attempting to rewrite the history of the riot, criticizing congressional Democrats and former Vice President Mike Pence for standing up to falsehoods about the 2020 election and allowing it to be certified…again continuing to flog the same dead horse.

It is just the latest turn of events in a year in which Trump has attempted to rewrite election rules, take control of state and local election systems and offered support to those who promote election conspiracy theories. He granted clemency to all of the nearly 1,600 people charged in connection with January 6, including attackers of law enforcement officers and the leaders of right-wing extremist groups.

A New York Times review of Trump’s public statements found more than 150 instances in the past year alone in which he falsely claimed he had won the 2020 election, and went on to portray January 6 rioters as victims, while deprecating investigators of the Capitol riot.

Even this past weekend, as the United States was carrying out a military operation to capture the president of Venezuela, he was still fuming over his 2020 loss to Joe Biden.

Trump repeatedly posted on social media over the weekend, sharing conspiracy theories about American elections, including that the CIA rigged his election loss; that widespread fraud may have stolen state-run elections from him in Georgia and Pennsylvania; and that election machines made by Dominion Voting Systems were somehow in on the plot. All these claims have been repeatedly disproved…yet the beat down goes on.

Trump is indeed the master of beating and riding a dead horse into the sunset.

I would urge the President to read (in between his late night textcapades) the humorous Dead Horse Theory. In part, it is often used to illustrate the futility of continuing to invest time, effort, or resources into a failing or unproductive endeavor in a tongue in cheek sort of way. It is based on an old Dakota tribal wisdom that says, “When you discover that you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount.”

Sounds like good advice.


Editors Note: The writing here would not be complete without hearing from PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) who have graciously weighed-in on the flogging/beating of a dead horse. 

PETA, argues that the ‘beating/flogging of a dead horse’  trivializes animal cruelty and has proposed replacing the phrase with ‘feeding a fed horse’ as a more humane characterization. 

Perhaps we should reclassify the dead horse as “living-impaired” and use the euphemism to avoid facing the reality of talking about death altogether.__lec

A Word Or Two About Words

                      L.E. Caldwell     …The Inane Ramblings of a Geezerly Septuagenarian        Some of my happiest and most fulfilling...